Monday, January 14, 2013

Praise the Giant Squid; He Inked for Your Sins



Well, here we are.  It's 2013, and the Mayans were wrong.  Newton theorized that the world wouldn't end until at least 2060, so barring an Egyptian demon-themed chunk of space rock plowing into the Atlantic, we should be fine until then.  That is, of course, providing we don't destroy ourselves first, and unfortunately, we aren't that far away from it.



No, I didn't mean that.  Although, that may be a blessing in disguise.  I simply meant that we were on the verge or tearing our own society apart, and if that were to happen, we would have no one to blame but ourselves.  We are letting this happen.  After all:

We live in a country where paranoia runs rampant.  78 years after his suicide, Adolf Hitler is still America's biggest boogeyman.  Any unpopular act by our government is immediately associated with history's greatest monsters by media and citizen alike.  Invading a country?  Hitler did that.  You know who else took away guns and organized the people?  Stalin.  My favorite one so far has been, and I quote, "I saw a movie where only the police and army had guns.  It was called Schindler's List."

The difference?  Moustache.  Oh, and a lack of genocide.


Let's get a few things straight here.  Obama has done good things, and he has done bad things.  Bush did good things, and he did bad things.  The same can be said of presidents, prime ministers, and monarchs throughout history.  However, tax hikes and gun control do not warrant comparison to a mass murderer who tried to wipe out entire races and cultures for having inferior genes.  Not only is it ignorant and frankly disrespectful, it's dangerous.  Our paranoia has grown to the point that nothing our government says is taken at face value.  I don't know if it started with the Kennedy assassination or what, but it seems that nothing can happen in this country without a contingency accusing the government of involvement or conspiracy.  See 9/11, Benghazi, Kennedy assassination, Columbine, Sandy Hook, Aurora, the BP pipeline rupture, etc.  I've always thought it was rather funny that in an age where we know when people go to the bathroom and the POTUS getting a blowjob in the Oval Office becomes national news, anyone could think such a large conspiracy could go unnoticed.  The same guy that couldn't pronounce nuclear or strategy organized the greatest false-flag operation in U.S. history?  I don't think so.


We live in a country where might makes right.  Don't like my opinion?  I'll kick your ass.  Criticize this country?  Our army will come kick your ass.  Power in this country no longer derives from the wealth or intelligence of its citizens.  It derives from the size of the military and what said military did in X war.  Remember when Alex Jones told Piers Morgan that "1776 would happen again?"  Case in point.  On a side note, here's a riddle.  An invading army attacks a country across the ocean.  The natives know the land and use that to their advantage to fight off a superior and well-trained fighting force.  Meanwhile, on the home front, the war is strongly opposed as some do not want to pay the cost in terms of money or human life, and some even identify with the enemy.  The question: did I just describe America in Vietnam or Great Britain in the American Revolution?

The original hippie.

Most of this comes from the anonymity provided by the internet.  It's very easy to be threatening or imposing when you're talking to someone on the other side of the world while safe at home in front of your computer.  You may not have said anything, but asskicker69 is gonna beat the shit out of that guy.  We think it's harmless, but it's not because there is a growing number of people who cannot separate the virtual world from the real world.  We can be anyone or anything online, but what have we become?


However, the greatest threat to America, at least in my opinion, is ignorance.  Ignorance of history, ignorance of the world around us, and ignorance of other people and their cultures.  We live in Huxley's dystopia where the people are passive and obsessed with trivial things like the centrifugal bumblepuppy.  We have "news" programs that cover what celebrities are dating, what clothes they wear, and where they're going on vacation.  Turn on the news and watch while the ticker mentions riots in Greece and Egypt, civil war in Syria, floods and earthquakes in China, famines and droughts in Africa, and tornadoes in the American Southeast, while the "anchors" gab about food and awards shows.  We pray for children in other states that are dying of cancer not because we know or care about them, but because of this invented sense of nationalism.  I ask you, who prays for this child:

Child killed by military forces in Syria, 2012.

It's because we don't care.  We simplify things, and we ignore them because that's the way the world is supposed to be, according to the general public.  Africa is supposed to be full of disease and suffering.  People in the Middle East are always fighting and rioting.  It's true that such occurrences are common in certain parts of the world, but that does not make them normal or right.  But as long as it doesn't affect us and our way of life, it doesn't matter, or so it seems.  One of the most offensive things I have ever seen, and I have sadly seen it or more than one occasion, is a bumper sticker that reads "Everything I need to know about Islam I learned on 9/11."  By that logic, a Muslim would not be wrong in saying "Everything I need to know about Europeans I learned from the Crusades."  History provides a much broader perspective on so many walks of life, and a little self-education would go a long way.  Instead, we let our preachers, our parents, and our media personalities do our thinking for us.  Meanwhile, we meander through our daily lives, concerned with Facebook, swag, and the club.  This is not to say that those things are bad; they are a break from the depression that is the real world.  More and more, however, the real world is becoming a break from them.


The American Empire will eventually fall, of that I have no doubt.  The question is how far that fall will be.  History may not repeat itself, but it does rhyme, and every empire, from the Greeks and the Romans to the Ottoman and the British, has eventually lost its dominance.  Who will be our successors?  Where will we fit in?  I don't know the answers, but I do know that we will get to that end a lot sooner if we don't try to strengthen ourselves from the inside and do away with foolish notions of partisanship, ignorance, and fear.  Maybe we need something we can all unite behind.  Maybe we need a big wake-up call.  Maybe Adrian was right.  Maybe we need a giant squid.


 
"The best revenge is to be unlike him who performed the injury."- Marcus Aurelius



Monday, July 16, 2012

Top 10 Batman Villains...Who Aren't the Joker


     Of all the comic book heroes, no one has a more notorious or popular rogues gallery than Batman.  Each villain has his or her own quirks and a devoted fanbase, but so many of them are overlooked because they fall short of the penultimate Batman villain: the Joker.  The Joker is without a doubt Batman's greatest and most famous foe and is also arguably the greatest villain in all of comics.  The insanity, the humor, and the spontaneity, along with great performances from Jack Nicholson, Heath Ledger, and Mark Hamill, have made the Clown Prince of Crime so endearing over the years.  But what about the rest?  All of Batman's other opponents have existed in the Joker's shadow so long, they don't always get the respect they deserve.  So today, we're going to count down the top 10 Batman villains who aren't the Joker.  Some are obvious, some are a little surprising, but they're all great threats for the Dark Knight.


                                                                                10.

 The Penguin
      On the surface, there isn't anything intimidating about a short, squatty man in a top hat with a thing for birds and umbrellas, but that's where you'd be wrong.  The Penguin is one of Batman's oldest and most popular foes, and the character is also one of the most complex.  Whereas most of Batman's enemies are psychopaths and murderers, Oswald Cobblepot is perfectly sane, completely aware of all his actions.  Over the years, we've seen two different versions of the Penguin: the suave aristocrat and the social outcast, and while the prior has become more common as of late, the latter makes the character much more sympathetic, especially in Batman: The Animated Series and the Joker's Asylum story arc, and even in the Batman Returns film as well.  While he has shied away from major crimes in recent years, unlike his comrades, he is not out of the criminal underground completely, operating instead in relative safety behind the front of the Iceberg Lounge, and even though he spends his time dealing in petty crime, there is always the potential that the Penguin will once again spread his wings and strike again.


9. 


 Calendar Man
     Calendar Man had been a joke since his inception in 1958 thanks in no small part to some bad costumes and puns.  That all changed with his inclusion in the 1996 series The Long Halloween.  While an unknown murderer preys on the Gotham criminal population, even Batman is stumped as to the killer's identity, leading him to turn to an unlikely ally: the Hannibal Lecter-esque Julian Day.  Day's obsession with dates and holidays has made him unpredictable, but combine that with the intelligence he shows in The Long Halloween and the frustration he shows over being forgotten about in an era of much more prominent and deadly villains, and Julian becomes a time bomb waiting to go off.  Although he hasn't acted yet, the day is coming when Calendar Man proves once and for all that he is not someone to laugh at.


8.

 Victor Zsasz
     When I did my post about the 13 greatest horror movies, I rated The Texas Chainsaw Massacre so high because of the realism of the killer.  That same principle applies here to Victor Zsasz.  Men with umbrella guns, women controlling plants, guys with freeze guns, and plots to release deadly laughing gas on a city are all directly out of the comic books.  But stabbing people at random because you're crazy?  That's completely plausible, and that's what makes Zsasz so scary.  No rhyme, no reason, just murder.  Zsasz has said that he believes his only purpose in life is to kill, which he sees as a gift to give to the useless, mindless people of Gotham.  He takes pride and pleasure in his killing, carving a tally into his flesh for every one of his victims.  And if you need proof of how proficient he is, take a look at the marks on his hands, arms, back, chest, etc., and if you find an empty spot, rest assured it's reserved for Batman. 

 
7.

  Hugo Strange
     Each of Batman's villains seems to have their own obsession.  Harvey Dent has his coin, Penguin has his birds, and Calendar Man has his dates.  Hugo Strange has an obsession, too: Batman.  His only concern in life is figuring out who Batman is, and as he slips further into madness, becoming the Batman himself.  Strange is one of the Caped Crusader's most dangerous foes simply because of what he knows.  On several occasions, Strange has deduced that Batman and Bruce Wayne are one and the same, only to have the Dark Knight make him forget or second guess himself.  This is a constant problem for Batman, who as he deals with the countless other criminals of Gotham, must always remember that somewhere out there, there is a brilliant psychologist who is only a step or two away from uncovering Batman's identity and bringing him down for good.


6.

 Poison Ivy
     Female superheroes are fairly rare in the world of comics, and female supervillains even more so.  That alone makes Poison Ivy rare, but in the Batman universe, there is one more factor that separates Ivy from the crowd: she is one of the few Batman villains who actually possesses any superpowers.  Whether it be her control of deadly plants, creation of new hybrids, ability to ensnare men with her pheromones, or poison them with a touch or a kiss, Pamela Isley is a force to be reckoned with (and on a personal note, the Poison Ivy levels were always the most annoying/difficult levels of every Batman video game I ever played).  Uma Thurman's portrayal of the character in the disaster that is Batman and Robin was a little too campy, as was the rest of the film, but go back to the comics or even the animated series to get a sense of the real direness of the character.  With a goal to protect and empower all the world's plants at any cost, Poison Ivy is one villainess that Batman hates to tangle with.


5.

 Ra's al Ghul
     Batman's goal over the years has been to try and maintain some resemblance of order in a world dominated by chaos.  So, when someone else approaches him and says that he also wants to eliminate this depraved criminal world for the betterment of society, you'd expect Batman to be right beside him.  Instead, you get Ra's al Ghul, one of Batman's most intimidating and complex foes.  The magic of the Lazarus Pits has granted him immortality, and in his centuries of life, he has become a genius in so many fields.  He is a master manipulator, as seen in Batman Begins and JLA: Tower of Babel.  His power has grown over the years to the point that he has become an opponent for several characters in the DC universe.  Still, his greatest aspect is his warped altruism that would seek to create a great new world at the expense of destroying the world we have now.  No other character has walked the line between potentially good and absolute evil so well as Ra's al Ghul, and with his daughter romantically linked to Batman and his grandson Damien taking the mantle as Robin, he will be more personally involved in Batman stories in the years to come.


4.

  The Riddler
     This one is my personal favorite on the list, and it's due in part to the original Batman character.  When Batman debuted in 1939, it was in Detective Comics, and he was touted as the world's greatest detective.  The incredibly intelligent aspect of the character was what appealed to me, and if there is anyone in Gotham that can match wits with the Bat, it's Edward Nigma.  Desperate to prove that he is the smartest man in the city, the Riddler is only held back by his own compulsion to leave clues to his crimes behind.  Unfortunately, the character lost some of its credibility following Batman Forever and to many comic fans, he became a prancing maniac in tights.  But the Riddler is much more dangerous than that, as seen by his mastery and manipulation of other villains in the Hush story arc.  His flipping back and forth between semi-hero and lunatic right before the relaunch added even more depth to the character, and even thought he may not be a physical threat, whatever it takes to get himself noticed, you can bet the Riddler will put hid mind to it.


3.

 Bane
     One of the worst things about Joel Schumacher's Batman and Robin was the movie's treatment of the character Bane.  He was portrayed as a brain dead lackey, no better than a DC Hulk ripoff.  True, Bane is abnormally strong, but every superhero has at least one foe who's main power is that they can break through walls or pick up a car.  What raises Bane above that is his intelligence.  Bane had spent so many years in a godforsaken prison reading and learning that he could have become a member of high society if it weren't for his murderous rage.  He's complex, switching from hero to villain, and sympathetic, keeping a teddy bear with him growing up in prison.  But of course, Bane's major claim to fame is that he has done something that no other villain has been able to do: he manipulated every one of his compatriots and broke the Batman, both physically and mentally.  He is the perfect blend of both brain and brawn, and his upcoming appearance in The Dark Knight Rises will surely add even more to Bane's legacy as perhaps Batman's most dangerous opponent.


2.

  Scarecrow
     What drove Bane to Gotham City is what has become Batman's greatest weapon in his war on crime: fear.  Fear rules in Gotham, and Batman has used his ability to inspire fear to keep moat of the city's criminals in line.  But what works for Batman also works for the Scarecrow.  Dr. Jonathan Crane is another brilliant psychologist who specializes in the study of phobias but uses his knowledge as a weapon, driven by the torment he received from others as a child.  A quick dose of toxin and your worst fears come to life, whatever they may be.  Scarecrow has the honor of being one of Batman's only truly scary villains, part comic book character and part horror movie antagonist.  Surprisingly, his shining moment thus far came in the Arkham Asylum video game, really digging into Batman's head, and for video game fans, it was one of the most fun parts to play.  Scarecrow is the flip side of the fear coin, to steal a pun from another Batman villain, using it for evil.  He is both obsessed with what scares Batman and scared of the Bat himself, which compels him to chase after Batman and will no doubt lead to countless battles in the future.

And number one is.....




1.

 Two-Face
     One of Batman's greatest foes is also one of Batman's greatest tragedies.  Bruce Wayne took the cowl to protect good people like his parents from low life criminals like their murderer, and he had a pretty good track record until Harvey Dent.  Harvey was Bruce's ally, his way out of his vigilante life, someone who could do in a courtroom what Batman did on the streets night after night.  That all changed went Dent took a splash of acid to the face, and along with his skin, Harvey lost his mind and his identity.  He is possibly Batman's most unpredictable opponent; there is no set list of what he will or won't do, as he makes every decision with the flip of a coin.  Two-Face blames Batman for what happened to him, and to an extent, Batman feels the guilt as well.  One of the animated series's best episodes was Two-Face's origin episode, in which Bruce is haunted in his nightmares by Harvey asking why he didn't save him, which Bruce ties right back to his parents' death.  Even Harvey struggles with is own identity, occasionally switching to reluctant hero, only to fall back into violence and chaos.  Two-Face's complexity, humanity, tragic origin, and depravity make him the second greatest Batman villain of all time. 
      

     


Thursday, October 27, 2011

13 Great Horror Movies

With Halloween fast approaching, seems everyone is getting into the scary spirit, and there's nothing better than turning off all the lights, curling up on the couch with a bowl of popcorn, and watching a good horror movie.  But which one?  With so many out there, including sequels, remakes, ripoffs, and just plain torture porn (Hostel, Saw sequels), it's easy to end up with the wrong one.  With that in mind, here are my picks for the 13 greatest horror films of all time.  While these may not be the absolute scariest, these are guaranteed to provide you with a good night and maybe a good fright.

Honorable mentions: Amityville Horror, The Mummy, Creature from the Black Lagoon, The Fog, Scream, House of Wax (1953), Paranormal Activity.

13.  Friday the 13th (1980)- Director Sean Cunningham

It is somewhat appropriate that we start this countdown off with the film that launched one of Hollywood's most notorious slashers, Jason Voorhees.  Ironically, the hockey-masked fiend doesn't appear until part two; the mask comes a sequel later.  The original follows our group of happy campers, including a young Kevin Bacon, as they are systematically killed off by an unknown assailant.  Remember those great campfire stories we all heard during the summer about the unlikeable janitor/counselor/camper who was died there and now haunts the campground seeking vengeance?  That mood is captured here perfectly.  The sequels are campy and somewhat ridiculous (See Part 8: Jason Takes Manhattan), and although they deliver a few thrills, nothing beats the original.  Not to mention, it did give us one other thing: the last-minute scare.  You've been warned.

12.  House on Haunted Hill (1959)- Director William Castle.

It is a general rule of thumb in horror movies that the remake is never as good as the original, and this is very true here.  While the 1999 remake stars great actors like Famke Janssen and Geoffrey Rush, they don't make the film as good as the classic.  Starring the incomparable Vincent Price, the film follows a group of strangers as they spend the night in a haunted house for the promise of $10,000.  Is it cheesy?  Yes.  Does it have plenty of high-pitched black-and-white era screams?  God, yes.  Is Vincent Price creepy in it?  This isn't The Ten Commandments, so of course he is.  The movie still remains one of my personal favorites in and out of the Halloween season and gave us one of the first haunted house movies.  Just be sure to look out for flying skeletons.

11.  Poltergeist (1982)- Director Tobe Hooper

Where I grew up, there was hardly any major building that wasn't a) built on an old Indian burial ground or b) haunted.  Combine the two and you get this gem about a family terrorized by the spirits living in their house.  The film starts off with a bang and features such terrifying elements as killer trees, killer clowns, killer ghosts, and a pit full of real rotting corpses, not to mention the classic quotes ("Go into the light," "It knows what scares you," and "They're here.")  While fans of the film remember the quirky Zelda Rubinstein as the psychic medium, the star of this film is sweet little Heather O'Rourke, who plays the youngest daughter and central target of the spirits, Carol Anne.  The fact that she is so precious and innocent makes for a compelling story.  People are also drawn to the film because of the legendary curse.  Several actors in the film and its sequel died after production, including O'Rourke.  The real life horror has drawn almost as many viewers as the simulated variety.  Oh, I almost forgot.  It was written by somebody named Steven Spielberg.  You may have heard of him.

10.  Night of the Living Dead (1968)- Director George Romero

A lot of people will remember this film as the first movie to feature zombies in it, but it's much more than that.  First, it's not the first movie to have zombies in it; several older movies featured them as villains, but they were found in jungles and the tropics and were often controlled by some evil mastermind.  These were different.  The zombies introduced to us by the legendary George Romero are independent and only have one thing on their mind: kill.  Night of the Living Dead gives us walking dead in the first five minutes and doesn't stop until the final frame.  Exemplifying the idea of a movie on a budget, the rest of the film follows a group of strangers trapped in a farmhouse as they devise a plan to escape the growing horde of stumbling, undead cannibals outside their door.  This movie belongs here for not only putting Romero on the map and inspiring zombie creators and sequels for decades to come, but also for creating one more fear for mankind to worry about:  our loved ones who want nothing more than to eat us.  Not to mention, the image of a zombified little girl chewing on a human leg is just flat-out disturbing.

9.  Freaks (1932)- Director Tod Browning

After the success of his previous horror film, Dracula, Tod Browning was given a new project by his producers: come up with a film scarier than Frankenstein.  What he came up with was one of the most disturbing and controversial films ever made.  Freaks follows members of a circus sideshow, specifically a trapeze artist and her love for a dwarf.  His fellow freaks do not trust her motives but accept her nonetheless.  However, when she leaves him for the circus strongman, they decide to take their bloody revenge.  The film so disturbed audiences that it was banned for decades in Australia and the UK and Browning soon fell out of the Hollywood loop.  Browning had done his job, though; he did make a scary movie.  While it is unsettling to see the "normal people" as the villains in the film, the real scary part is some of the freaks themselves.  Browning takes great care not to ridicule them; the cast was composed of real circus freaks including half-men half-women, dwarfs, bearded ladies, bird people, a human skeleton, and Prince Randian, born without arms or legs. There is, however, nothing quite as frightening as the sight of all the freaks stalking the trapeze artist with the chant of "We will make you one of us."

8.  Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)- Director Wes Craven

One of the main things people always complain about concerning horror movies is if the killer in the house, why not run away?  Well, what if you couldn't?  What if, no matter how hard you tried and how far you ran, that killer would hunt you down and kill you in your sleep?  That's the premise of Craven's classic.  A group of teenagers are haunted by the spirit of a child murderer, whom their parents burned alive, who attacks them in their dreams; die in a dream, die in real life.  This movie breaks other slasher movie norms, as well.  First, while many of our killers are silent, Freddy Krueger is a comedian, breaking out one-liners and taunting his victims.  Secondly, while most of our killers are happy with a simple stab, slash, or broken neck, Krueger gets creative.  In his first feature film, Johnny Depp is sucked into his bed and basically becomes a blood volcano.  In the sequels, victims have their veins turned into marionette strings, are drowned in water beds, and have their heads smashed into televisions, among other gruesome means of demise.  This is the one horror movie my mother won't watch, and I can't blame her.  After seeing this, you may never sleep again.

7.   Nosferatu (1922)- Director F.W. Murnau

Before Dracula, The Lost Boys, Interview with the Vampire, or any other vampire film, there was Nosferatu, the silent German classic that introduced the undead bloodsucker to film.  The movie was the first full film adaptation of Bram Stoker's iconic novel Dracula, but the filmmakers were sued by Stoker's widow for copyright infringement.  Since they did not have permission, writers changed the names of all the characters to more German names.  While the plot is highly similar, there is one glaring difference.  While the title character in other versions of the Dracula films is suave, seductive, and rather charming, Count Orlok/Nosferatu is quite the opposite.  He is grotesque, with a bald head, pointed ears, razor-sharp teeth, and long, claw-like fingers.  Max Shreck, the man behind the makeup, is almost comical trying to pass himself off as a reclusive yet normal European count; a scene involving Orlok in his nightcap and robe actually made me giggle.  However, once he lets loose into his bloodthirsty alter ego, he is the definition of the word "scary," and the horror still echoes nearly 90 years later.

6.  Frankenstein(1931)- Director James Whale

The story of Frankenstein is virtually embedded in all our minds.  A mad scientist, trying to play God, resurrects a dead man with a rotten brain, and terror ensues.  Colin Clive is brilliant as Dr. Frankenstein ("It's alive, It's alive,") but it's horror legend Boris Karloff as the monster that steals the show.  Producers took great care not to let anyone see Karloff in his makeup before the movie premiered, giving the creature an air of mystery.  Even in the opening credits, the monster is simply listed as "?."  When he first appears on screen, he backs out of a doorway before slowly turning his face to the camera.  Once he was looking straight ahead, the camera locked on his face with his dead, sunken eyes, scars, and green skin that seemed to transcend the fact the film was black and white.  Audiences flipped out; many fainted or ran screaming out of the theater.  Although the monster is terrifying, we also feel sympathy for him with his childlike manner, even as he commits his crimes.  That complexity is what makes this a truly great film, but it's Karloff that makes it a great horror film.

5.  The Shining (1980)- Director Stanley Kubrick

If horror writing is an art, Stephen King is its Leonardo Da Vinci, and his Mona Lisa, at least in terms of his film adaptations, is The Shining, directed by the master Stanley Kubrick.  The plot, based on some of King's own experiences, follows a writer, played by the always entertaining Jack Nicholson, as he spends the winter in an empty mountain lodge with his wife and son.  Of course, the hotel is haunted, and after they are snowed in, it slowly drives them all into madness.  While critics dismissed the film at first, it has since become a horror classic, and it's easy to see why.  Most people remember the classic lines "Redrum!" and "Here's Johnny," but there are so many inexplicably creepy moments in the film as well.  Jack's manuscript.  The bartender.  The dead woman in the bathtub.  The twins.  The elevator.  Tony.  The hedge maze.  Whatever the hell that guy in the bear suit is supposed to be.  Each and every little moment will slowly make you feel unsettled as well.  A word of warning: turn off all the lights on this one, and you may regret it.

4.  Halloween (1978)- Director John Carpenter

Take a director in his youth, a cast of new faces with one established actor, and an incredibly low-budget, and what do you get?  The highest-grossing independent film of the 1970s and one of the greatest horror films of all time, Halloween.  Starring a young Jamie Lee Curtis, in her first film role, the movie follows a group of babysitters as they are stalked by  masked maniac Michael Myers,  who is, himself, being tracked down by his doctor, played impeccably by the late Donald Pleasence.  Halloween sticks out from a lot of other slasher films of the era.  It lacks the blood and gore of later films, which isn't a bad thing, and it actually gives us characters we care about.  A low budget might doom some films, but in this case, it's part of the film's charm.  While looking for the perfect mask for the killer, a crew member found a William Shatner mask.  Painted white and its hair teased out, the mask was a blank slate far creepier than anything before or since.  With no expense for someone to create a soundtrack, Carpenter wrote the music himself.  What he created was one of the most haunting and recognizable themes in cinema history.  The movie has plenty of jokes to couple with the screams, giving audiences a real treat.  Not to mention, the ending is a real shock, leading to one of the few well-done sequels in horror.  Fun fact: the film initially did very poorly in theaters and with critics, until one critic praised the film, comparing it to Psycho.  The critic's name?  Roger Ebert.

3.  The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974)- Director Tobe Hooper

Unkillable zombie in a hockey mask terrorizing summer campers?  Impossible.  Ghost of a serial killer killing teenagers in their dreams?  Implausible.  Lunatics killing tourists in the middle of nowhere, Texas?  Makes sense to me.  And that is what makes The Texas Chainsaw Massacre so terrifying.  The plot is simple: a group of young people traveling through the Texas countryside run afoul of a group of backwoods cannibals, most notably Leatherface, the chainsaw-wielding lunatic wearing a mask made of human skin.  As gory as the name would have one believe, the film relies more on implied carnage than the actual impalement and slaughter.  That's not to say there aren't a few gory bits.  What really makes the film scary is Hooper's presentation of the film as real.  The very beginning claims that this is all based on true case files, which isn't entirely untrue: Leatherface is based on the real-life serial killer Ed Gein, as is Norman Bates in Psycho and Buffalo Bill in The Silence of the Lambs.  The lack of a real soundtrack and documentary-style shooting makes it seem all too real, and it's all brought together by the gritty look of the film itself.  Ignore the sequels and the remakes; only the original is truly terrifying, something I know from personal experience.  I once watched the film with a group of friends: of the 20 of us, all but one of us screamed, and that was only because I had seen the movie before.

2.  Dracula (1931)- Director Tod Browning

Of all the classic Halloween monsters, none is more recognizable than Count Dracula, and it's all thanks to this 1931 classic.  The story, based on the stage play rather than Bram Stoker's novel, sees the enigmatic vampire Dracula leaving his reclusive mountain castle for England and new blood.  This tale has been told a hundred times, sometimes successfully, such as Francis Ford Coppola's 1992 version and the Spanish version that was shot at the same time and on the same set as this version.  Both are excellent, but there is one major thing they lack: Bela Lugosi.  Everything we associate with the stereotypical vampire comes from Bela's performance: the slicked back hair, the cape, the seductive nature, and that heavy Eastern European accent.  Ironically, we never see any fangs, but the movie doesn't need them.  Instead, we have the great dialogue ("Children of the night.  What music they make." and "I don't drink...wine.")  Most remastered versions include a soundtrack added by Philip Glass; the original had no soundtrack, and Glass's addition is equally as eerie as the silent background of the original.  However, it's still Bela that brings the picture together, and it's all in his stare.  With pen lights under his eyes, Lugosi's Dracula is as hypnotizing to audiences as he is to the other characters in the film, and it's guaranteed to give you chills.  Theater owners in the 1930s were often dared by producers to show this film and Frankenstein on a double bill to see if audiences could handle it.  Needless to say, many could not.

And the #1 horror movie is..........

The Exorcist (1973)- Director William Friedkin

What Citizen Kane is to American cinema, The Exorcist is to the horror genre.  It is the film that all other serious horror films are compared to and the one that all of them should try to emulate in that it breaks the rules of horror films.  12-year-old Reagan MacNeil is possessed by a demon, and her only hope lies with two priests, one being played by the legendary Max Von Sydow.  Think about most horror movies and who the victims are; they have usually brought the violence on themselves either through their actions or their loose morals.  Kids in slasher films that get knocked off are usually drinking, smoking, doing drugs, having sex, or swearing that the killer is either dead or doesn't exist.  The Exorcist lacks that element; Reagan is wholly innocent, and it is never fully explained why this demon chooses to possess the poor girl.  Not to mention, the movie really is scary.  The transformation this girl goes through, complete with the foul language, the head spinning, the vomiting, the creepy voices, and the levitating, are all truly terrifying.  Grab the director's cut, and you'll get even more scares, including the infamous spiderwalking scene.  Still not convinced?  The movie won two Oscars in 1974 and was nominated for another eight.  When was the last time you remember a horror movie winning an Oscar, let alone get nominated?  Plus, the soundtrack is just plain haunting.  If you need just one movie guaranteed to scare you, this is it.  Happy Halloween everybody!

Friday, September 23, 2011

In Praise of Pepper

Today, I lost the best dog I ever had to cancer.  Her name was Pepper, and she was 10 years old.  I know it doesn't matter now, but I could not think of a better way to remember her than right here, right now.

My mother and I picked her out from our local humane shelter when she was only four months old.  She was one of only two puppies from a litter to survive.  Initially, we could not decide between her and her sister, but there was something special about her.  Both puppies were brown, but Pepper's left front paw was completely white.  She melted my heart, and we took her home.  The shelter had named her Cupcake, but we decided she needed a different name.  Don't ask me how, I still don't know, but we decided on the name Pepper.

For the next few months, we kept her on the patio under our deck.  Ants were constantly trying to get into her food bowl, so we drew a chalk circle around it, because for some reason, that was supposed to work.  At night, we would spread out a large blanket and let her inside to play.  We would wrap her up and watch as she curiously poked her head back out.  She loved to climb stairs, which was funny, simply because she never figured out how to get back down, so we would carry her down, only for her to scurry right back up.

When she got bigger, we let her roam free in our backyard, where she soon became queen of the mountain.  She had a doghouse full of hay for the cold months and a pool (plastic trashcan lid) full of water for the summer.  She would always sleep on her back, leaned up against the fence.  For the longest time, she would not drink out of her water bowl.  Instead, she would drink out of her pool, often with two or all four paws in it as well.  She tried lying down in it once, but decided very quickly she did not like that.  She did fall asleep on top of it once when it froze one December, which made me laugh for hours.

She loved to do three things:  play, hunt, and sleep.  If she got a baseball in her mouth, you might never see that ball again.  We left her with my uncle while we went on vacation once and gave her a bag of baseballs to play with.  When we returned a week later, those balls looked like they had been run through a woodchipper.  We also got her a deflated basketball.  She would take it in her mouth, throw it down the hill, go get it, bring it back to the top, and do it again.  She would sleep the rest of the day, usually under the peach tree in the foxhole that she had dug.  Whenever I would come home from school or my mother from the store, she would pop up and pretend to chase some invisible prey, trying to convince us she wasn't napping.

She became quite the hunter as well.  In her life, she killed a bird, two squirrels, and at least 13 possums.  She would shake them so hard they would die from shock, but the poor little thing didn't understand it.  Instead, she would bury them and try to dig them to tussle with later.  We never knew exactly what kind of dog she was.  The best the vet could come up with was that she had terrier in her.  To me, she was the best kind of dog: a mutt.

We nearly lost her a few years ago to a heat stroke.  The vet told us after we got her in that if we had waited a few more minutes, she would have been a goner.  After a night in the hospital with a little doggie IV in her leg, we got her home.  We had to get her a haircut to keep it from happening again, and when she got back from the groomer, her thick brownish-red coat was gone.  She was naked except for a star-spangled bandana tied around her neck.  I'd never seen anything so pathetic and precious in my life.

Since around my junior year of high school, I have struggled with depression.  At times when I was constantly sad or distant, when I didn't want to talk to my friends or my family, I only had one friend, and she had four legs and a tail.  It didn't matter, though.  She was always there for me, with her happy face and her soulful brown eyes.  I don't think I would have made it through some of those tough days if it weren't for her. 

Some of the best times in my young life have revolved around that dog.  We played in the snow together, sat in swings together, played baseball, went on walks to the lake, and sat together for hours.  She developed somewhat of an addiction to dog bones in her later years.  Give her one, and she would devour it, then spend the next several minutes sniffing for more.  For a short time, she would not take them from my mother, after she accidentally tossed one and hit the poor thing in the head.  She loved them so much, we had to put her on a diet for a while,which did not sit particularly well with her.  Even when she got old, and she could barely move due to her arthritis, she would perk up for a bone.  Even at the very end, this last week, when she wouldn't eat anything else, she would occasionally eat a bone.

I feel no shame in telling you that I am crying as I write this.  I'm going to miss my puppy.  She has been with me for nearly half my life and during the most pivotal years.  I'm going to miss her brown eyes, white paw, wagging tail, and happy face.  I'm miss checking on her first thing every morning before school, and I'm going to miss seeing her bound up when I come home to visit.  I'm going to miss hearing her bark at the neighbor's dog and scattering dog bones all over the yard for her to find.  But most of all, I'm going to miss that constant love, the kind that never fades, fails, or questions, that is rare in people but always ready in the heart of an animal.  If I have learned anything, it's that as painful as it may be to lose someone you love, it's well worth the joy they bring into your lives to let them in, whether they have two legs or four.

Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Blade Ruinner

As many of you have probably heard by now, Ridley Scott is going back to one of his greatest masterpieces and royally screwing it up.  That's right, Blade Runner is coming into the era of pointless remakes and sequels, drawing the ire of every fan who ever saw the original.  Literally, I have yet to see one post, comment, or article where anyone, apart from Scott himself, that says "Oh goodie, they're making a an unnecessary sequel/prequel to a sci-fi classic 30 years after the fact!"

Let's face it.  Hollywood has run out of ideas.  I know, big news, huh?  You all know that; we've all known it for years, but that doesn't change the fact that it still hurts.  A vast majority of current and future projects are either sequels or remakes of perfectly good films (see Ghostbusters 3, Men in Black 3, Jurassic Park 4, etc).  There is a method to their madness besides lack of creativity.  One, it does bring in a new audience, a younger generation that might otherwise have dismissed it as their square parents' piece of crap.  Take Star Wars, for instance.  I know a lot of people who had never even heard of the original trilogy until the prequels came out.  Unfortunately, these reboots offer a lot more Jar Jar Binkses than Darth Mauls, which brings me to my second point. 

They are out there.  Everywhere.  You work with them, go to school with them, may even live with them, and you may not even know it.  They are...the fanboys.  When filmmakers decide to redo a movie or revive a movie series, I know what a lot of them are thinking.  They are thinking about how much they loved the movie when they were a kid, but now they've got a billion dollars and want to do it their way.  The problem is there are other people out there who love those movies as well, so much, in fact, that they don't want people screwing with the original or its legacy.  When news hits of a remake/sequel/prequel, the first question asked by the general public is "Will this live up to the original?"  The first question from fanboys is "Why the &@#$ are they doing this?  There was nothing wrong with the original!"  The problem with a lot of directors is that you can't just use the same title and pretend its just as good.  There's more to a beloved movie than just good acting or special effects.  Take the recent Clash of the Titans remake, for instance.  I enjoyed it for what it was, which was a pretty action film.  However, it lacked the camp of the original.  Yes, the first was cheesy with the claymation effects, but that's what made it so enjoyable.  You could totally redo The Ten Commandments and add an actual river of blood instead of painting the scene, but it would never be the same.

Now don't get me wrong.  Sometimes the remakes do work.  The original Piranha was dismissed as just another Jaws ripoff, which it was, but the remake set up for the dvd release and did fairly well at the box office.  Rob Zombie's Halloween is another good example, or even the new Fright Night.  Both take relatively tame, slightly cheesy movie classics and give them that sexier, more violent new millennium shine.  But all of these are horror movies.  Horror franchises can put out films until kingdom come because people go to see them to either be scared, to see terrible people ripped in half, or to see gratuitous nudity.  Nobody goes to a horror movie for story and characters, which are the backbone of good movies like Blade Runner and can't be replicated, no matter how much money they pour into it.  Maybe it will be good, maybe it won't.  I'm not holding my breath, but I will withhold final judgment until its release in 2014.  At least Ridley Scott is toying with his own movie.  The Dirty Dancing remake, on the other hand?  That guy can go fuck himself.  RIP Patrick Swayze. 

Tuesday, August 16, 2011

Thoughts on Raw at 3 am

Consider this an introduction.  I'm a huge wrestling fan in the sense that I like good wrestling, good stories, and unexpected plot twists.  With TNA sinking faster than the Titanic these days, I stick to my good old WWE.  So naturally, when I have my Monday nights off, I like to plop down on the couch, Turn on Raw, and turn up the volume.  In more recent years, I have come to realize that I have a somewhat insane/masochistic relationship with my wrestling, insanity here being defined as doing the same action over and over expecting different results and masochism as doing something you know will hurt, whether physically or mentally, whilst grinning like an idiot.  I watch Raw and Smackdown when I can, knowing full well that the show will probably suck.  I can predict the outcome of every bit in the show, and my brain hurts from doing it.  Each week, I tune in hoping that maybe, just maybe, tonight's show will be a little less sucky, and it rarely is.  I watch to see talented guys put on an entertaining show that keeps the audience glued to the action, not get put in stupid bits and cheesy movies while an interchangeable group of impractically dressed skanks pull hair and fake bulldogs for the tenth week in a row.  However, in spite of all that, I was generally pleased with the results of the show from 8/15.  Rey Mysterio and Alberto Del Rio put on a great match.  It was a fitting ending to the show, and I was all ready to flip over to catch the second half of Jon Stewart until who should arrive like an unwanted Superman but John Cena.  Heaven forbid they have one show without this overhyped army-wannabe.  He pummels Del Rio and decides that he's pissed off at him.  Not at CM Punk, who beat him down, or at Triple H who made the controversial 3-count, or even the guy that directed 12 rounds(because God knows after I saw it, I wanted to bash someone in the head), but Del Rio.  Why?  Because Alberto cashed in his Money in the Bank briefcase on a weakened champion, which was for whatever reason terrible.  This coming from the same guy who commended both The Miz and Edge for doing the same, "sensible" thing, the latter against.....Cena himself.  Yes, I know it's scripted.  I don't hate John Cena on a personal level; I respect the work he's done for charity and such.  But the writers and the guys organizing these shows need a real wake-up call.  First of all, do they even pay attention to old storylines?  It doesn't really work when you just magically change a guy's attitude towards another for no apparent reason (see Undertaker/Kane we're brothers/I hate you gimmick that gets rehashed every few years).  The wrestling audience, for at least some part, is smarter than that.  Want proof?  Watch the shows, read the tweets and the facebook posts, read the magazine articles.  Pay attention to each fan and who they're favorite wrestler is.  See the kid whose first show this is, who's not quite old enough to realize that it's not all real, who's decked out in the shirt and the hat with the fake belt his parents got to enhance the experience?  Chances are he's screaming for John Cena.  Same goes for the preteen girl who thinks he's just so dreamy, or the middle-aged trailerwife who "knows" it's real(this comes from personal experience).  Now find the real wrestling fans, the ones who know real names, failed gimmicks, win-loss records, and are virtually walking wrestling encyclopedias.  Chances are, they're the ones responding to every "Let's go Cena" chant with a heartfelt "Cena sucks!"  Just because you're in the main event week in and week out does not mean you're the best wrestler or even the best entertainer.  It just means that you're going along with what you're supposed to do.  I have seen plenty of very talented guys and girls who could outperform the best of them get stuck with bad gimmicks and get relegated to 5 minute time fillers or the unemployment line.  The more I think about it all, I am taken back to the mid-90s.  They tried to tell us that Bret Hart and Rocky Maivia were the good guys, while Steve Austin and DX were villains, but the audience didn't go with it.  The bad guys became the most popular superstars, while Rocky's career really took off after his heel turn.  The guys at the top need to realize that their audience does not consist entirely of children and simpletons who have to be told who is good and who isn't.  Until then, I will just sit back and wait until next Monday so I can watch two hours of the same thing again.  Or maybe not.....